model 07 — ecological stock-flow consistent · define-uk · UK · experimental

Climate policy meets the UK financial system.

Who bears a climate-policy scenario — through balance sheets, not an output gap. The replication record, and the ceiling the publications impose on it.

define-uk · UK · experimental · 28 pages

DEFINE-UK: running and gating an unlicensed ecological stock-flow consistent model

One gate passes, one diverges, two close at a ceiling. The manual's Table 4 macro block replicates — population and labour force exact to 0.01m, growth matching to 0.06pp at 2030 and 2040 — but the 2025 growth miss of −0.30pp clears a ±0.31pp gate set after the run, so that year is a pass of the tolerance and not a match, and the paper labels it that way at the point of claim. Baseline emissions diverge and are pinned rather than tolerated: 393 vs 407 MtCO2e/yr in 2025, 343 vs 382 in 2030, 249 vs 324 by 2040 (−3.5% / −10.2% / −23.3%, computed from the pinned ratios).

No numeric v1.1 scenario results are published, so the two scenario targets are closed at the achievable ceiling, not passed: what is gated is scenario design plus two coarse anchors from a pre-1.0 conference version, and the emissions anchor admits 330–352 for a published claim of “just under 350”. The upstream is unlicensed — fetched at pinned commit 846081a at runtime, never vendored or hosted — and the baseline sits far from outturns (2025 growth 4.66% against an ONS 1.31%), so the adapter serves deltas, never levels. The 1.78 green-investment multiplier is ours and is not comparable to any published multiplier. In parallel, a clean-room Python reimplementation is 118 contiguous equations into its second milestone, with thirteen manual defects pinned as machine-readable gap records.

Your browser can’t display PDFs inline. The paper is 28 pages — open or download it instead.

Open the PDF
28 pages · pdf

Inline PDF viewing is unreliable on mobile browsers, so it’s disabled here. Open the paper in your device’s PDF reader instead.

Open the PDF

Source & reproduction: papers/define-uk/ on GitHub  ·  Replication report →  ·  All papers →

Cite this work

Ahmadi, Vahid (2026). “DEFINE-UK: running and gating an unlicensed ecological stock-flow consistent model.” PolicyEngine Macro working paper. https://policyengine-macro.vercel.app/papers/define-uk

@techreport{policyengine2026defineuk,
  title       = {DEFINE-UK: running and gating an unlicensed ecological stock-flow consistent model},
  author      = {Ahmadi, Vahid},
  year        = {2026},
  institution = {PolicyEngine},
  url         = {https://policyengine-macro.vercel.app/papers/define-uk},
  note        = {PolicyEngine Macro working paper}
}

No DOI is assigned. For an exact version stamp, cite the git commit of the artifact you used from github.com/PolicyEngine/macro. The model design belongs to its authors (George and Dafermos, SOAS); the replication and the clean-room implementation are ours, and are not endorsed by them.